The Forsyte Saga Volume 2(144)
‘I offered him a seat, but he said he hadn’t been in the House since Gladstone moved the Home Rule Bill, and then only because he was afraid his father would have a fit.’
Sir Lawrence screwed his eye-glass in.
‘That’s not clear to me,’ he said.
‘His father had a pass, and didn’t like to waste it.’
‘I see. That was noble of Old Forsyte.’
‘He said that Gladstone had been very windy.’
‘Ah! They were even longer in those days. You covered your ground very quickly, Michael. I should say with practice you would do. I’ve a bit of news for Old Forsyte. Shropshire doesn’t speak to Charlie Ferrar because the third time the old man paid his debts to prevent his being posted, he made that a condition, for fear of being asked again. It’s not so lurid as I’d hoped. How’s the action?’
‘The last I heard was something about administering what they call interrogatories.’
‘Ah! I know. They answer you in a way nobody can make head or tail of, and that without prejudice. Then they administer them to you, and you answer in the same way; it all helps the lawyers. What is there for dinner?’
‘Fleur said we’d kill the fatted calf when I’d got my speech off.’
Sir Lawrence sighed.
‘I’m glad. Your mother has Vitamins again rather badly; we eat little but carrots, generally raw. French blood in a family is an excellent thing – prevents faddiness about food. Ah! here they come!… ’
It has often been remarked that the breakfast-tables of people who avow themselves indifferent to what the Press may say of them are garnished by all the newspapers on the morning when there is anything to say. In Michael’s case this was a waste of almost a shilling. The only allusions to his speech were contained in four out of the thirteen dailies. The Times reported it (including the laughter) with condensed and considered accuracy. The Morning Post picked out three imperial bits, prefaced by the words: ‘In a promising speech.’ The Daily Telegraph remarked: ‘Among the other speakers was Mr Michael Mont.’ And the Manchester Guardian observed: ‘The Member for Mid-Bucks in a maiden speech advocated the introduction of children into the Dominions.’
Sir Alexander MacGown’s speech received the added attention demanded by his extra years of Parliamentary service, but there was no allusion to the insinuation. Michael turned to Hansard. His own speech seemed more coherent than he had hoped. When Fleur came down he was still reading MacGown’s.
‘Give me some coffee, old thing.’
Fleur gave him the coffee and leaned over his shoulder.
‘This MacGown is after Marjorie Ferrar,’ she said; ‘I remember now.’
Michael stirred his cup. ‘Dash it all! The House is free from that sort of pettiness.’
‘No. I remember Alison telling me – I didn’t connect him up yesterday. Isn’t it a disgusting speech?’
‘Might be worse,’ said Michael, with a grin.
‘“As a member of the firm who published this singular production, he is doubtless interested in pressing it on the public, so that we may safely discount the enthusiasm displayed.” Doesn’t that make your blood boil?’
Michael shrugged his shoulders.
‘Don’t you ever feel angry, Michael?’
‘My dear, I was through the war. Now for The Times. What shall I say?
‘SIR,
‘May I trespass upon your valuable space (that’s quite safe), in the interests of public life – (that keeps it impersonal) – to – er – Well?’
‘To say that Sir Alexander MacGowan in his speech yesterday told a lie when he suggested that I was interested in the sale of Sir James Foggart’s book.’
‘Straight,’ said Michael, ‘but they wouldn’t put it in. How’s this?
‘To draw attention to a misstatement in Sir Alexander MacGown’s speech of yesterday afternoon. As a matter of fact (always useful) I ceased to have any interest whatever in the firm which published Sir James Foggart’s book, The Parlous State of England, even before I became a member of the late Parliament; and am therefore in no way interested, as Sir Alexander MacGown suggested, in pressing it upon the public. I hesitate to assume that he meant to impugn my honour (must get in ‘honour’) but his words might bear that construction. My interest in the book is simply my interest in what is truly the “parlous state of England”.
Faithfully, etc.
That do?’
‘Much too mild. Besides, I shouldn’t say that you really believe the state of England is parlous. It’s all nonsense, you know. I mean it’s exaggerated.’