Mike looked puzzled. “No, Jubal.”

“Well, you have wondered about it, haven’t you? Where did the Sun come from? Who put the stars in the sky? Who started it all? All of it, everything, the whole world, the Universe . . . so that you and I are here talking.” Jubal paused, surprised at himself. He had intended to make the usual agnostic approach . . . and found himself compulsively following his legal training, being an honest advocate in spite of himself, attempting to support a religious belief he did not hold but which was believed by most human beings. He found that, willy-nilly, he was attorney for the orthodoxies of his own race against—he wasn’t sure what. An unhuman viewpoint. “How do your Old Ones answer such questions?”

“Jubal, I do not grok . . . that these are questions. I am sorry.”

“Eh? I don’t grok your answer.”

Mike hesitated a long time. “I will try. But words are . . . are not . . . rightly. Not ‘putting.’ Not ‘mading.’ A nowing. World is. World was. World shall be. Now.”

“‘As it was in the beginning, so it now and ever shall be, World without end—”’

Mike smiled happily. “You grok it!”

“I don’t grok it,” Jubal answered gruffly, “I was quoting something, uh, an ‘Old One’ said.” He decided to back off and try a new approach; apparently God the Creator was not the easiest aspect of Deity to try to explain to Mike as an opening . . . since Mike did not seem to grasp the idea of Creation itself. Well, Jubal wasn’t sure that he did, either—he had long ago made a pact with himself to postulate a Created Universe on even-numbered days, a tail-swallowing eternal-and-uncreated Universe on odd-numbered days—since each hypothesis, while equally paradoxical, neatly avoided the paradoxes of the other—with, of course, a day off each leap year for sheer solipsist debauchery. Having thus tabled an unanswerable question he had given no thought to it for more than a generation.

Jubal decided to try to explain the whole idea of religion in its broadest sense and then tackle the notion of Deity and Its aspects later.

Mike readily agreed that learnings came in various sizes, from little learnings that even a nestling could grok on up to great learnings which only an Old One could grok in perfect fullness. But Jubal’s attempt to draw a line between small learnings and great learnings so that “great learnings” would have the human meaning of “religious questions” was not successful, as some religious questions did not seem to Mike to be questions with any meaning to them (such as “Creation”) and others seemed to him to be “little” questions, with obvious answers known even to nestlings—such as life after death.

Jubal was forced to let it go at that and passed on to the multiplicity of human religions. He explained (or tried to explain) that humans had hundreds of different ways by which these “great learnings” were taught, each with its own answers and each claiming to be the truth.

“What is ‘truth’?” Mike asked.

(“What is Truth?” asked a Roman judge, and washed his hands of a troublesome question. Jubal wished that he could do likewise.) “An answer is truth when you speak rightly, Mike. How many hands do I have?”

“Two hands. I see two hands,” Mike amended.

Anne glanced up from her knitting. “In six weeks I could make a Witness of him.”

“You keep out of this, Anne. Things are tough enough without your help. Mike, you spoke rightly; I have two hands. Your answer was truth. Suppose you said that I had seven hands?”

Mike looked troubled. “I do not grok that I could say that.”

“No, I don’t think you could. You would not speak rightly if you did; your answer would not be truth. But, Mike—now listen carefully—each religion claims to be truth, claims to speak rightly. Yet their answers to the same question are as different as two hands and seven hands. The Fosterites say one thing, the Buddhists say another, the Moslems say still another—many answers, all different.”

Mike seemed to be making a great effort to understand. “All speak rightly? Jubal, I do not grok it.”

“Nor do I.”

The Man from Mars looked greatly troubled, then suddenly he smiled. “I will ask the Fosterites to ask your Old Ones and then we will know, my brother. How will I do this?”

A few minutes later Jubal found, to his great disgust, that he had promised Mike an interview with some Fosterite bigmouth—or Mike seemed to think that he had, which came to the same thing. Nor had he been able to do more than dent Mike’s assumption that the Fosterites were in close touch with human “Old Ones.” It appeared that Mike’s difficulty in understanding the nature of truth was that he didn’t know what a lie was—the dictionary definitions of “lie” and “falsehood” had been filed in his mind with no trace of grokking. One could “speak wrongly” only by accident or misunderstanding. So he necessarily had taken what he had heard of the Fosterite service at its bald, face value.